DEF & fuel economy: Fleets surveyed

DEF & fuel economy: Fleets surveyed

With the introduction of 2010 EPA-compliant diesel engines, which included selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology, diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) has become a mandatory commodity for all fleet managers running these engines. Many of those fleets still have questions about how it impacts day-to-day operations. In an August 2013 online survey of the trucking industry, PEAK Commercial & Industrial, the makers of BlueDEF, found that the top concern of those surveyed was how DEF with SCR technology impact overall fuel economy.

With the introduction of 2010 EPA-compliant diesel engines, which included selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology, diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) has become a mandatory commodity for all fleet managers running these engines. Many of those fleets still have questions about how it impacts day-to-day operations. In an August 2013 online survey of the trucking industry, PEAK Commercial & Industrial, the makers of BlueDEF, found that the top concern of those surveyed was how DEF with SCR technology impact overall fuel economy.

Survey respondents were provided the following choices and asked to rank their top concerns with DEF usage as follows:

• Performance in freezing temperatures;

• Effect on fuel economy;

• Additional cost to overall maintenance budget;

• Proper storage;

• Ease of accessibility (finding it when needed); and

• Contamination (using the right accessories).

Not surprisingly, fuel economy ranked number one with the highest overall ranking, followed by added maintenance costs and performance in freezing temperatures. 

According to Dr. Frank Cook, senior vice president of new product development with Peak Commercial & Industrial explains, “With the use of DEF with SCR technology, the engine can be tuned to run at optimal conditions, which gives a more complete fuel burn and better fuel economy. 

Understanding there are questions about the trade-off of additional DEF cost versus fuel saved, Cook provided this breakdown: 

• If you get better fuel economy as a result of SCR engines and save 3%, that would be 3 gal. of diesel at $4 a gal. for every 100 gal. of fuel (about $12 saved);

• At a 3% treat rate you would use 3 gal. of DEF for that same 100 gal. of fuel (about $8.37 spent); and

• Since DEF is less than the cost of diesel, operating costs are actually lower. For every dollar spent on DEF, it is about 40 to 50 cents less you are spending on diesel fuel, which is a solid return rate.

Typically fleets only have to fill the DEF tank once every 6,000 mi., which can be via truck stop pumps, company storage containers or retail containers, Cook added.

According to the Diesel Technology Forum (www.dieselforum.org), SCR technology is one of the most cost-effective and fuel-efficient technologies available to help reduce diesel engine emissions. A all heavy-duty diesel truck engines (produced after Jan. 1, 2010) must now meet the EPA standards, among the most stringent in the world, reducing particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) to near zero levels. 

There are environmental benefits since SCR can reduce NOx emissions up to 90% while simultaneously reducing HC and CO emissions by 50 to 90% and PM emissions by 30 to 50%. Other benefits include cost savings related to the fact that SCR systems can be combined with a diesel particulate filter to achieve even greater emission reductions for PM. The Forum also reports that in the commercial trucking industry, some SCR-equipped truck fleets are indeed reporting fuel economy gains of 3 to 5%. 

You May Also Like

Why it’s important to test new engine oils

Last month, I mentioned that the North American Council for Fleet Efficiency (NACFE) recommended that fleets switch to the API FA-4 low viscosity lube oils immediately to save fuel and decrease (GHG) emissions. As stated by the report, viscosity is defined as a measure of a fluid’s internal resistance to flow. In a truck’s engine,

Fuels and lubes column

Last month, I mentioned that the North American Council for Fleet Efficiency (NACFE) recommended that fleets switch to the API FA-4 low viscosity lube oils immediately to save fuel and decrease (GHG) emissions. As stated by the report, viscosity is defined as a measure of a fluid’s internal resistance to flow. In a truck’s engine, mechanical losses from pumping and friction consume approximately 16% of the total energy input to a vehicle. A lower-viscosity aims oil to reduce those engine mechanical losses and save fuel.

Tire costs are down, but not my tire CPM?

In a recent meeting I was a part of, a fleet owner began by saying that the cost of rubber is down, oil is down, and his profits are down; so why aren’t tire costs down? He has a point—some fair non-bidding negotiations brought adjusted tire costs down. So why are tire costs-per-mile not coming down?

Truck Fuel Economy Ideas
Where is our national energy policy?

Our lack of a technically based national energy policy has, and will continue to, cost us billions. You and I have financed such ridiculous schemes as corn-based ethanol and solar-powered home devices, and the cash outflow shows no sign of abating. Related Articles – Beyond standard TPMS: The crucial role of customizable tire health alerts

Fleet Equipment On the Road
Who is controlling the checkbook?

A recent fleet cost reduction meeting, requested by the president, called for our department heads to come up with three cost saving initiatives outside of the normal box. The thinking was to fire up and measure the results from each idea going forward. The real intent, in my opinion, was to see what people have

Heavy-Duty-Truck-Checkbook-Budget
Driving to maximize fuel economy

While working at Shell Oil Co.’s Wood River Research facilities, my engineering team was tasked with determining relationships between gasoline composition and drivability and fuel economy. This would be much easier today due to the impressive electronic devices available, but in 1969, we had to do things the hard way. Related Articles – Thermo King

Fuels and lubes column

Other Posts

Interior Corrosion – Public Enemy Number One to Semi-Truck Cabs

In-cab corrosion is a big deal in the heavy-duty trucking industry, costing fleets five-to-six figures annually. Every fleet manager in the business would love to eliminate in-cab corrosion, but how? Chemicals are introduced to the cab by a driver’s boots, and drivers are in and out of the truck numerous times a day. The salt and

HDAW unveils 2022 education lineup

Conference organizers for Heavy Duty Aftermarket Week (HDAW) have announced the educational themes that will be covered during HDAW ’22, taking place in-person Jan. 24-27 at the Gaylord Texan Resort in Grapevine, Texas. During the educational workshops on Tuesday, Jan. 25, HDAW says attendees will hear from industry leaders and experts who will provide insights

Interior Corrosion – Public Enemy Number One to Semi-Truck Cabs

In-cab corrosion is a big deal in the heavy-duty trucking industry, costing fleets five-to-six figures annually. Every fleet manager in the business would love to eliminate in-cab corrosion, but how? Chemicals are introduced to the cab by a driver’s boots, and drivers are in and out of the truck numerous times a day.  The salt

Interior Corrosion – Public Enemy Number One to Semi-Truck Cabs

In-cab corrosion is a big deal in the heavy-duty trucking industry, costing fleets five-to-six figures annually. Every fleet manager in the business would love to eliminate in-cab corrosion, but how? Chemicals are introduced to the cab by a driver’s boots, and drivers are in and out of the truck numerous times a day. The salt