Pondering the issue of speed governors

Pondering the issue of speed governors

May I ask a favor? It’s OK—I’m not trying to borrow money or power tools. What I really need is for someone to explain to me, in terms that are both simple and concise, what the issue with speed governors is. I am prone to confusion about many things, but speed governors and heavy trucks? What is the problem here?

This debate started 10 years ago, when the American Trucking Association (ATA) and Road Safe America petitioned the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) introduced speed governors as a mandatory spec. While there is a lot of regulation and legislation surrounding the trucking industry that causes me to stop in my tracks and splutter, this suggestion was not one of them.

Speed governors would seem to improve both safety and fuel efficiency. Unless I have been operating in a parallel universe for the past 25 years, safety and efficiency have always been highly regarded in transportation. Many fleets now outfit the governors as standard without being required to, and again I ask: What is the problem?

The ATA describes such mandatory spec as “common sense regulation.” This seems a fundamentally logical stance to adopt. Owner–Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), conversely, argues that, “When cars and trucks operate at different speeds on the highway, there is a significant negative impact on safety. Traffic is more dynamic and less predictable. Accidents increase.”

Accidents don’t increase when traffic is more dynamic and less predictable. Accidents increase when people drive like idiots. From my point of view, the OOIDA logic does not work.

Oliver Dixon always delivers. Click here to read more of his columns from the pages of Fleet Equipment.

I have experience driving in both regulated and non-regulated environments in terms of speed governors. They were made mandatory in Europe around 1993, and therefore, it is instructive to look at the accident statistics therein. In 1992, there were 71,535 fatalities on European roads. In 2013, for the same area, there were 25,938 fatalities. I am not trying to suggest that the mandatory spec’ing of speed governors caused this reduction—far from it—but my math won’t allow me to get to a place where speed governors increase accidents but fatalities fall by 64%. And goodness knows I have tried.

There are three issues here on which the industry would do well to occupy the same page. If you cap a vehicle’s speed, you reduce fuel consumption. A Class 8 truck driven at 75 MPH will likely use more fuel than one driven at 65 MPH. If you cap a vehicle’s speed, you may not reduce accidents, but I don’t see how you increase them.

Finally, as a simple issue of industry PR, the impact upon the public psyche of driver in a hurry, blowing the mirrors out on a Middle American family ensconced in a sub-compact, is unlikely to be a positive one. How you make an argument for unrestricted speeds for heavy trucks to the public at large and make it sound in any way coherent is beyond me.

Once again, there is much to question concerning much of the regulation that impacts transportation—no one is arguing with that—but this is really common sense. There is a blunter way of looking at this issue: If you are one of the naysayers here, and your business model demands that you have to drive an 80,000 lb. truck at speeds in excess of 65 MPH to make a living, might I respectfully suggest that, in this instance, it isn’t the regulation that warrants criticism but your business model. It’s time to be sensible about this.

You May Also Like

New ways to help your trucks maintain the proper tire pressure

Let’s take a look at some of the new products that are helping trucking companies get the most ROI out of their tires.


As evidenced by all the new tire inflation offerings at this year’s NACV show back in October, new technology is allowing fleets to keep a closer eye on tire pressure. Let’s take a look at some of the new products that are helping trucking companies get the most ROI out of their tires:

What’s behind the slow adoption of FA-4 oil?

Introduced three years ago, the American Petroleum Institute (API)’s CK-4 and FA-4 oil categories were billed as the next generation of oil, improving on the engine protection and fuel economy benefits offered by previous engine oil categories.

How will today’s ‘customer focus’ translate to tomorrow’s electric trucks?

Over the past three years, OEMs have invested heavily in driver-focused equipment benefits—from cozy creature comforts to uptime- and productivity-boosting technology. Today, significant R&D investment is going into the development of electric trucks—probing the possibilities of untested powertrains in hopes of producing a product that meets application needs.

Benchmarking success: Utility fleets are using performance metrics to drive measurable improvements

Fleet executives at the annual Electric Utility Fleet Managers Conference (EUFMC), discussed benchmarking. For fleet managers on the panel, using data and performance metrics is a means of showing opportunities for improvement, through which cost savings can be realized.

Sleeper supremacy: A focus on the customer has led to more fleets spec’ing large, decked-out sleepers

Across the business world, companies are becoming more and more interested in emulating the success of Amazon. It’s a model that many truck OEMs are now following as they sharpen their focus on fleet customers, learn what equipment will meet the customers’ needs and deliver the products that they want.


Other Posts

ATA expresses support for Modern, Clean and Safe Trucks Act

The American Trucking Associations (ATA) released a statement praising the introduction of the Modern, Clean, and Safe Trucks Act of 2021 by Senators Todd Young (R-IN) and Ben Cardin (D-MD). The bipartisan legislation would repeal the 12% federal excise tax (FET) on heavy-duty trucks, which currently adds approximately $22,000 to the cost of the average

TMC survey finds increase in unscheduled roadside truck maintenance

A recently released TMC/FleetNet America Vertical Benchmarking Program survey found an industrywide increase in the frequency of unscheduled roadside maintenance, the American Trucking Associations announced. The TMC/FleetNetAmerica survey found that during the first quarter of 2021, fleets averaged 29,506 miles of operation between unscheduled road repairs—down 18.7% from the fourth quarter of 2020. Related Articles

Generic truck safety
TMC welcomes Collision Repair Forum to 2021 Fall Meeting

The American Trucking Associations’ Technology & Maintenance Council and the Heavy Duty Repair Forum (HDRF) has agreed to co-locate its fall events at the 2021 TMC Fall Meeting and Transportation Technology Exhibition this September in Cleveland. The HDRF is the largest conference solely dedicated to the heavy-duty collision repair industry, the group says, and this

ATA Truck Tonnage Index decreased slightly in May

American Trucking Associations’ advanced seasonally adjusted (SA) For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index decreased 0.7% in May after falling 0.6% in April, the organization reports. In May, the index equaled 113.7 (2015=100) compared with 114.5 in April. April’s reading was revised down slightly to -0.6% from ATA’s May 18 press release. Compared with May 2020, the SA