The pros and cons of truck driver-facing cameras

The pros and cons of truck driver-facing cameras

Put yourself in the shoes of a truck driver—the person you depend on to operate your equipment as efficiently and productively as possible. Your life is spent on the road, and while you have a schedule and goals to hit (MPG levels, on-time deliveries, etc.), above all, one of the great perks of your job is the freedom it offers. To be out on the open road, driving solo—truck drivers treasure this.

Now imagine that one day you come into work, ready for your cross-country run, and your boss tells you that they’re installing driver-facing cameras in your cab to watch what you do on the road. Kind of puts a damper on that freedom, doesn’t it?

This is the common driver perception that fleets spec’ing driver-facing cameras as part of a video telematics program are facing. Drivers who learn that such a program is being instituted likely bristle, visions of an always-watching “Big Brother” and accusations of spying and invasion of privacy leaping into their minds.

From their perspective, it’s easy to understand. The fact that the video is only triggered and sent to the fleet manager in the event of a crash is almost beside the point—it’s the fact that it’s there that’s the problem, and that’s not an easy barrier to get past. It can also foster feelings that the fleet doesn’t trust its drivers. It’s a complicated culture issue that’s not easy to get past.

Yet, from an equipment management point of view, video telematics can be incredibly helpful not just for the fleet, but for the driver too, as the benefits of driver-facing cameras include exonerations from potential lawsuits after collisions, as well as driver coaching that can cut down on crashes, distractions and other dangerous situations.

Naturally, there’s some debate over whether taking advantage of this technology is worth it—even among the suppliers of video telematics themselves.

Of the 170-plus customers of Trimble’s Video Intelligence solution (formerly known as PeopleNet), which offers multiple camera choices including front-facing, driver-facing, side-facing and backup cameras, only four have chosen to use the driver-facing camera. That’s according to Jim Angel, Trimble’s vice president of video intelligence solutions.

“We’ve actually kind of seen a declining percentage of driver-facing cameras,” Angel said. “One carrier launched the program with both forward- and driver-facing cameras, but they didn’t leave that driver-facing camera on for more than two or three months before they turned it off. And they did that out of respect for the fact that their drivers were telling them that this wasn’t what they signed up to do. Many carriers are having this same problem; it becomes a retention issue.

“Keep in mind,” he went on, “you’re dealing with a group of individuals that, generally speaking, are mid-50s, they’ve been doing this for a long time, and you’re entrusting them with a $250,000 vehicle. When they come to report to work, you’re telling them that you’re going to watch everything they do, and for some of the old-school drivers, it doesn’t sit very well.”

On the other hand, many suppliers of in-cab video said that while drivers are often opposed at first, a policy of clear communication with your drivers about what you’re doing and why can soften that stance and get them on board with the video program.

“The fleets that have been the most successful are the ones that included their drivers in the conversation about added video technology before making the final decision,” said Drew Schimelpfenig of the Omnitracs Safety Center of Excellence. “They also reminded their drivers that the real possibility of exoneration would be the primary benefit. For those fleets that had already established a strong culture of safety, it was no surprise to their drivers that their company wanted to move to the next best thing they could do to continue to advance and defend that same culture.”

Kristin Costas, director of product management at Lytx, acknowledged that driver privacy was a concern when the company introduced driver-facing cameras, but said that over the past five to seven years, the company has seen “a strong shift” in driver attitudes about the cameras.

“We consult with our customers on addressing driver concerns,” she said. “We have pretty robust driver orientation trainings and sessions that we take fleets through to get them comfortable with the technology and what it’s going to do for them.”

Understanding your fleet’s driver culture, anticipating push-back and having a clear and open communication strategy between management and the driver pool is the key to successfully deploying in-cab cameras.

“Drivers are typically conscientious, responsible professionals who view that obligation through the same lens as executives,” said Jason Palmer, chief operating officer for SmartDrive. “Any apprehension from drivers is typically due to a breakdown in communication and a desire for transparency. Making clear the company’s purpose for adopting video-based technology can seamlessly ensure driver buy-in.

“Without video, drivers and managers may have differing views on what occurred on the roadway,” he added. “With video, any missing pieces and areas of question are clearly visible, enabling a collaborative, constructive discussion about improved driving skills.”

Brendan Buzer, product manager for Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems, said that while fleets are divided on the use of in-cab cameras and drivers could push back initially, it only takes one video exonerating a driver from a case of wrongdoing to turn them into avid fans.

“We find that once drivers have seen that videos are able to provide them with protection during incidents they are more accepting of the technology,” Buzer said, noting that while some fleets would like to have in-cab video, others believe that similar benefits can be seen with just a forward-facing camera.

SmartDrive’s Palmer suggested that fleets implement a driver incentive program to work in conjunction with the video-based solution to encourage and reward driver safety, a program he noted is in place for many fleets already. This could be a good way to get drivers on board with the cameras, so long as you’re not cutting into the camera ROI.

This is not to say that all drivers will rebel against in-cab cameras.

Trimble’s Angel explained that there are certain applications where it makes more sense than others to have a driver-facing camera. He gave the example of one customer that utilizes the driver-facing camera: a hazmat company that has a strict no-smoking policy for drivers, as they’re hauling extremely flammable gas that could ignite if the driver smokes in the cab. That said, Angel cautions that it’s not for every fleet.

“You have to ask yourself,” he said, “is the information that’s in the cab necessary to exonerate your driver from an accident that they were not responsible for when you have all the information outside the cab?”

In other words: will it do more harm than good? It is possible that you can get all the information you need from the outward, forward-facing cameras in the event of a lawsuit. In fact, if some cases, the information exclusively provided by the driver-facing cameras may be more likely to point the finger at your driver—who may be on his or her phone, dozing off at the wheel, or otherwise distracted—than to exonerate the driver. And if that’s the case, do you even want that information available in a potential court case?

Every fleet is different, and different groups of drivers may respond differently to the idea of driver-facing cameras. Clearly, there are multiple sides to this story—even among the providers of those driver-facing cameras. We’re not here to tell you that one way is right and that the other is wrong—just know that there are two sides to this story, and that either way, this is potentially delicate and will take clear communication to drivers, being open to conversation and being clear about the potential benefits to the drivers as well as the fleet.

You May Also Like

Drivewyze, Bestpass partnership to integrate weight station bypass, toll management solutions

The collaboration will support on the rollout of a Drivewyze toll trip report, providing GPS-based toll event data.

Drivewyze and Bestpass have recently announced a new partnership to address fleet and driver pain points with tolling. The partners are aligning their offerings to streamline onboarding and support for fleets adopting weigh station bypass and toll management services.

Drivewyze offers PreClear weigh station bypass services at more than 840 sites in 45 states and provinces. In addition, it offers Drivewyze Safety+, a proactive in-cab safety alerts and driver-coaching service, which includes features allowing fleets to create in-cab toll road notifications. Bestpass works with over 50 tolling authorities across the U.S. providing a comprehensive payment platform with a focus on nationwide toll management for commercial fleets with solutions for 100% of major toll roads.

An overview of the TPMS and ATIS offerings

There is a wide variety of tire inflation technology available, both in TPMS and ATIS form. Let’s take a quick look at some of the offerings.

New ways to help your trucks maintain the proper tire pressure

Let’s take a look at some of the new products that are helping trucking companies get the most ROI out of their tires.

Tire-Care-Generic-800x400
Using the proper coolant is essential to protect engines

The solution is training. Anyone who may add coolant to a radiator needs to understand the type of coolant required by the vehicle and the danger of topping off with the wrong coolant.

coolant-colors-800x400
Manufacturers continue to roll out electric medium-duty trucks

Peterbilt, Kenworth, Navistar, Daimler, Freightliner and Cummins are a few of the companies making recent leaps in electric medium-duty truck development.

Peterbilt-EV-220-800x400

Other Posts

ERoad launches Clarity Get for Clarity dashcam

ERoad recently announced the launch of Clarity Get, an expansion on the ERoad dashcam video telematics solution, Clarity Solo. Clarity Get allows fleets to view video clips that are important to your operation, as well as historical video footage from MyEROAD, a cloud-based fleet management platform or mobile application. EROAD Clarity Get combines HD video, GPS tracking

Clarity-Get-EROAD-1400
The biggest truck technology stories of 2022

Technology is changing the way all things operate. In the world of heavy-duty trucking operations, fleets are constantly looking for ways to work smarter, not harder. Now, technology is supporting processes that are automated, instantaneous and increasingly available to the trucking industry. With all of the developments, integrations, partnerships and product advancements, looking into technology progression

best-of-tech-1400
Assured Telematics driver safety report coming to trucks with Lytx camera

Assured Telematics says that its driver safety report will be available in early 2023 to all fleets with a factory-installed Lytx dash camera system on select commercial trucks. The driver safety report, which has been custom developed by Assured Telematics, combines a fleet operator’s real-time telematics data from Geotab with the joint customer’s Lytx data to provide efficient insights

Assured-Telematics-driver-safety-report-600
Volta Trucks to provide 16 Volta Zeros, charging infrastructure to Heppner in France

Volta Trucks has announced the first implementation of its new full-electric Volta Zero with Truck-as-a-Service charging infrastructure to Heppner, a creator of transport and logistics solutions and an independent leader in international transport from and to France. Related Articles – Rockview Farms deploys Volvo LIGHTS project’s final two VNR Electric trucks  – Lion Electric announces

Volta-Heppner-1400