The cost of integration in the trucking industry

The cost of integration in the trucking industry

Last year was the year of integration for the North American Class 8 business. What was previously the strategy that dare not speak its name became, over the past 12 months, the strategy whose name was everywhere. Wards Data implies that the take rate on in-house engines now sits at 61.8%, based on sales figures, and it seems fair to argue that the days of an industry landscape dominated more by an assembly than a manufacturing mindset have now passed us by.

We have all heard the benefits of integration. We have all read the marketing materials. As regulatory compliance gets more stringent, the need to control the entire design process becomes more essential.

Because we are not dumb, we have done the math and can work out that to large, globally scaled OEMs competing in a global regulatory environment that is fast converging, this is all good. From a manufacturing perspective, building one product for three major markets (North America, Europe and Japan) is a whole lot cheaper than building three separate products for three major markets. In terms of simple, fixed cost absorption this is a no-brainer. Moreover, as dealers begin to see greater revenues accruing from greater captive aftermarket business, their business become more sustainable. From a manufacturing perspective, the in-source/out-source question has become predicted upon the scale of the addressable market—akin to asking whether or not one should stick one’s hand in the fire or not. It is not a difficult question to answer.

Integration is a process that will not be without its winners and its losers, at least from the supply side of the business. For the truck buyer, its also presents a double-edged sword as it demands that a lot of trust be placed in both the judgment and ultimately the competency of others. The past few years may not have filled the North American truck buyer with complete confidence in its suppliers not to screw up and we could understand any residual reticence here.

If we look to a longer term, then integration enables a lot more than an improved income statement. More years ago than I care to remember, I was driving one of the first automated manual transmission-equipped European trucks through central London heading to one of the big wholesale markets. The experience taught me two things: First, never answer the phone on a Sunday afternoon; and second, the whole vehicle seemed to work together. As I drove around the City Road en route to Smithfield, it wasn’t a case of truck, engine and transmission, but of vehicle and task.

It seems kind of obvious now, but that was a hazy insight into the future, not just of the transportation product—the truck—but of the transportation process—the entire task of moving stuff from A-to-B which is, ultimately, how people make their money from this business. Integration may allow for better vehicle design from a compliance standpoint, but it also allows for better product design from a task perspective too. Is this important? Yes it is.

There is only so much more that can be done to reduce fuel consumption beyond which point diminishing returns set in …

There is only so much more that can be done to reduce fuel consumption beyond which point diminishing returns set in. Infinite monkeys and infinite typewriters will produce a vehicle that runs on Frito’s and a Kenny Rogers medley, but the issue here is “infinite.” I have a budget and infinite it ain’t. There will come a point at which vehicles will be about as efficient as they can get and we must be fast approaching it. Integration broadens out the scope of efficiency gains almost exponentially, and while it is easy to understand the reticence of some buyers in welcoming it, the downside that accrues from dismissing it could be significant.

You May Also Like

Peterbilt GM Jason Skoog charts today’s truck support, tomorrow’s truck solutions

Peterbilt made headlines recently when it became the first major North American OEM to open orders for an electric truck, the Peterbilt 220EV. In this exclusive interview, Peterbilt General Manager and PACCAR Vice President Jason Skoog details the technology investments that are keeping fleets productive during this year’s trying pandemic and laying the groundwork for

Peterbilt General Manager PACCAR Technology Electric Truck

Peterbilt made headlines recently when it became the first major North American OEM to open orders for an electric truck, the Peterbilt 220EV. In this exclusive interview, Peterbilt General Manager and PACCAR Vice President Jason Skoog details the technology investments that are keeping fleets productive during this year's trying pandemic and laying the groundwork for the electric trucks that Peterbilt aims to start rolling off the line by the end of the year. Click the story above to read.

What’s behind the slow adoption of FA-4 oil?

Introduced three years ago, the American Petroleum Institute (API)’s CK-4 and FA-4 oil categories were billed as the next generation of oil, improving on the engine protection and fuel economy benefits offered by previous engine oil categories.

Slow-Adoption-Oil-800x400
How will today’s ‘customer focus’ translate to tomorrow’s electric trucks?

Over the past three years, OEMs have invested heavily in driver-focused equipment benefits—from cozy creature comforts to uptime- and productivity-boosting technology. Today, significant R&D investment is going into the development of electric trucks—probing the possibilities of untested powertrains in hopes of producing a product that meets application needs.

Volvo-electric-truck-VNR-800x400
Benchmarking success: Utility fleets are using performance metrics to drive measurable improvements

Fleet executives at the annual Electric Utility Fleet Managers Conference (EUFMC), discussed benchmarking. For fleet managers on the panel, using data and performance metrics is a means of showing opportunities for improvement, through which cost savings can be realized.

International-800x400
Sleeper supremacy: A focus on the customer has led to more fleets spec’ing large, decked-out sleepers

Across the business world, companies are becoming more and more interested in emulating the success of Amazon. It’s a model that many truck OEMs are now following as they sharpen their focus on fleet customers, learn what equipment will meet the customers’ needs and deliver the products that they want.

Peterbilt-sleeper-800x400

Other Posts

Sustainability, decarbonization through fuel efficiency

Better fuel economy can lower costs, minimize environmental impact and improve sustainability — thoughtful engineering can help see those results.

Trucking-Sustainably-mar24-Volvo-fuel-efficiency-emissions-decarbonization
Volvo Trucks new VNL: Lineup overview

We dive into the VNL’s fuel efficiency, safety and take it for a spin.

volvo-vnl-truck
Volvo Trucks new VNL touts engine, transmission enhancements

Volvo says its engineers overhauled the Volvo D13 engine and I-Shift transmission — let’s see what’s changed.

Volvo-VNL-powertrain-improvements-exterior
Peterbilt SuperTruck 2 takes center stage at CES

The OEM tells us how they exceeded DOE freight efficiency expectations.

peterbilt-supertruck-CES-1400