Diving into engine downspeeding

Diving into engine downspeeding

To improve efficiency of the powertrain, engine downspeeding can be achieved with either a 6×4 or 6×2 axle configuration. However, all the driveline components must work in concert to ensure proper performance.

“Regardless of axle configuration, customers should always work with their OEM, engine rep and or axle rep to specify the correct drivetrain configuration that will work for them,” said Karl Mayer, director of product line management, North America Drive Axles for Meritor. “The entire system must be matched, including engine, clutch, transmission, driveline, axle model and ratio, along with tires. Each of these working together is needed to optimize fuel economy, startability and gradeability.”

Mayer went on to explain that with fast axle ratios, it’s important to note that some of the drivetrain components may need to be upsized, which can lead to increased cost or weight. He also continued to stress the importance of the fleet working directly with the OEM and supplier.

“An important point to remember is that vehicles must be specified for their specific application,” he said. “If a customer has a vehicle with a downsped engine and very fast axle ratios running longhaul during the day, it may experience performance and component life issues if that same vehicle is utilized for pickup and delivery at night.”

For example, Brad Williamson, manager, powertrain marketing for Detroit, explained that fleets that typically haul more than 80,000 lbs. or drive faster than 65 MPH, should first evaluate downspeeding against duty cycles before making a decision.

To accommodate a downsped engine, the transmission needs to be tuned to handle the engine speeds and an axle needs to be ready to accept it. It’s not a function of the axle configuration, but instead a function of the axle ratio, that downspeeding needs to perform correctly, Williamson said. “The main reason for choosing a 6×2 over a 6×4 is the available ratios and the desire to improve fuel economy, because there is an increase in efficiency with a 6×2 configuration,” he stated.

Engine downspeeding requires axles with sufficiently fast ratios to maintain the 200 HP needed at the wheel end despite the lower engine RPM. However, for every 100 RPM drop in engine speed, the torque goes up significantly to maintain full power. In a recent whitepaper, Dana Holding Co. explained the complications of this high-torque axle environment. It stated, “by decreasing an engine’s RPM at cruise speed from 1,450 RPM for the typical engine to 1,125 RPM for a downsped engine, torque loads in the driveline increase by 57%. These higher torques place added stress on the axle, driveshaft and inter-axle shaft, greatly reducing the life of these components, especially U-joints.

“An axle with numerous innovations [is necessary] to improve performance in a high-torque environment, including more capable primary gear, more capable input shaft and pinion splines, more capable input and pinion bearings, and faster ratios to match intended operating speeds with superior reliability over the long haul,” explained Steve Slesinski, director of product planning, Dana Commercial Vehicle Driveline Technologies. “Engine downspeeding also requires a driveshaft and inter-axle shaft engineered to maximize the efficiency and durability of the tandem axle, with innovations such as a larger U-joint cross engineered for high strength, larger bearings with greater capacity, and a high-density package to fit within existing design envelope.”

For those concerned that adding more robust driveline components will add weight and lower efficiency, fear not: Detroit, Dana and Meritor all agree that the added efficiency that downspeeding offers more than offsets any additional weight or potential decrease in payload. Meritor’s Mayer explains:

“It may be a surprise, but weight has a very minimal impact on fuel economy,” he said. “Studies have shown that 1,000 lbs. in weight reduction would equate to a .5% to .8% increase in fuel economy, so the reverse would be true of additional weight negatively impacting fuel economy.”

If you compare similar 6×4 and 6×2 axle ratios, downspeeding can improve fuel savings by 2% to 2.5%, according to Meritor.

Dana reported that the gain in fuel efficiency achieved by slowing down the engine at highway cruise speed is approximately 1% for each 100 RPM reduction in engine speed enabled by faster axle ratios. This calculation applies to both 6×4 and 6×2 configurations, Slesinski explained.

You May Also Like

Nikola CEO on battery electric trucks, building trust, and the future of hydrogen fuel cells

“We’re real and we’re here.”


Michael Lohscheller, CEO of Nikola Trucks, watches his Class 8 Nikola Tre battery-electric truck, sporting nine battery packs for 733 kWh of energy to reach a range up to 330 miles, pull up to the front of the Orange County Convention Center, home to the TMC Annual Meeting last March. Suit coat discarded on the back of a folding chair, sleeves rolled up, he shakes the hand of a rider climbing out of the truck and holds the door for the next fleet manager in line. The battery-electric truck quietly rolls away to take another lap around Orlando.

Freightliner M2, SD Plus Series launch updates its medium-duty truck offering

Freightliner introduced the new Plus Series–enhanced versions of its M2 and SD models, including the M2 106 Plus, M2 112 Plus, 108SD Plus, and 114SD Plus. The enhanced models provide a major update to the interior and electrical systems of the M2 and SD models. The OEM noted that the Plus Series is designed to

Truck cruise control technology that looks at the road ahead

If you’ve ever visited the Northeast region of the country, you’ve most likely encountered intimidating terrain. The winding roads. The steep hills. The intricate routes that challenge any seasoned driver, and, most recently, advanced cruise control systems that aim to improve fuel efficiency and driver comfort.   Related Articles – Four ways A.I. can help cut

Four ways A.I. can help cut diesel fuel costs

The fluctuation of fuel prices has made it more challenging to operate day-to-day. Drivers get paid by the mile, and, when fuel costs go up, margins shrink, impacting how fleets profit and pay their employees. Intelligent technology can lessen the impact of high prices by improving overall fuel efficiency. Related Articles – New ways to

Peterbilt GM Jason Skoog charts today’s truck support, tomorrow’s truck solutions

Peterbilt made headlines recently when it became the first major North American OEM to open orders for an electric truck, the Peterbilt 220EV. In this exclusive interview, Peterbilt General Manager and PACCAR Vice President Jason Skoog details the technology investments that are keeping fleets productive during this year’s trying pandemic and laying the groundwork for

Peterbilt General Manager PACCAR Technology Electric Truck

Other Posts

Cummins-Meritor to relaunch management system 

OEMs benefit from this profitable approach, Cummins-Meritor noted in a recent press release.

Overall new equipment business volume down slightly Y/Y

According to ELFA findings, total headcount for equipment finance companies was down 4.6% year-over-year.

Growth rate of parts aftermarket sales continues to gradually decelerate

CMVC’s Parts Aftermarket Sales Leading Indicator signals slowing growth in commercial vehicle parts sales.

Eight fleets selected to participate in NACFE’s electrification initiative

The transition to electric vehicles is about much more than just the trucks themselves. It is about charging, infrastructure and more.